The AI Race: Who Owns the Chips, the Energy and the Rules?
The race is not decided by algorithms alone: a chip made in one corner of the world, electricity demand that doubles, and legislation that draws the lines. Where does the Gulf stand?

The Nano capsuleOne minute
States compete over AI across three material and regulatory links. The most advanced chips are concentrated: a report by the US Semiconductor Industry Association and Boston Consulting Group put 92% of capacity below 10 nanometres in Taiwan, and in October 2022 Washington imposed export controls on advanced chips bound for China. On energy, the International Energy Agency estimates data-centre consumption at about 415 terawatt-hours in 2024 and about 945 in 2030 in its base case. Europe bet on rules through its AI Act. And a Saudi entity has announced computing partnerships, but an announcement is not yet operating capacity.
Read the full article Collapse the article
A report prepared by the US Semiconductor Industry Association with Boston Consulting Group in 2021 estimated that 92% of the world's capacity for the most advanced chips, those below 10 nanometres, lies in Taiwan, and 8% in South Korea. The report described this concentration as "single points of failure" that natural disasters or conflicts could disrupt. Every advanced model you read about today passes through those chips before it reaches you.
The chip: one narrow link
On 7 October 2022 the US Department of Commerce announced rules restricting the export of advanced computing chips and semiconductor manufacturing equipment to China, and required licences for exporting manufacturing equipment to chip fabrication plants there, with a presumption of denial for facilities owned by Chinese entities. The chip has thus become an instrument of policy and not merely a commodity. The figure above dates from 2021, and the picture may change as factories and restrictions change; what matters is the pattern of concentration, not today's exact percentage.
Energy: a physical constraint
The International Energy Agency estimates that data centres consumed about 415 terawatt-hours in 2024, roughly 1.5% of global electricity consumption, and that they could reach about 945 terawatt-hours in 2030 in its base case, around 3%. The agency notes that the United States and China together account for nearly 80% of the growth in this demand. This is a scenario estimate, not a certainty, but it warns that AI competes for electricity just as it competes for chips. For more, see the article "Artificial Intelligence on Physical Ground: Electricity, Water and the Cloud".
Models: a count, not quality
Stanford's AI Index (2025) counted 40 notable models produced by the United States in 2024, 15 by China, and 3 by Europe combined. This is a count of models, not a measure of their quality; the same index notes that DeepSeek-V3 achieved high performance using fewer computational resources than many leading models, and that leading American models have generally been more compute-intensive.
Europe: a bet on rules
The European Union chose to begin with legislation. The AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024; its prohibitions began to apply on 2 February 2025, and the obligations for general-purpose models on 2 August 2025. The deadlines for high-risk systems were then postponed by an amendment that entered into force on 27 July 2026, so that they now run from 2 December 2027 for sensitive uses and from 2 August 2028 for regulated products. The European example shows that rules themselves need review and adjustment.
The Gulf: from announcement to capacity
In May 2025 HUMAIN, owned by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, announced a deal with Nvidia to supply 18,000 GB300 chips for a single supercomputer, with an intention to supply "several hundred thousand" over five years and to build data centres with a capacity of up to 500 megawatts. These are announcements, and turning them into operating capacity requires skills, data, electricity and regulation. On the human and linguistic condition, see the articles "Arabic Artificial Intelligence: Do We Make or Consume? Sovereignty and Arabic Language Models" and "Localising AI: Cultural Context, Not Interface Translation".
What remains?
The race is not decided by one link, and we do not yet know who will advance. The sounder question is: which links do we need to master, in which do we take part, and how do we protect ourselves from the failure of any one of them? Then we take the means and rely on God.
References
- Semiconductor Industry Association & Boston Consulting Group, Strengthening the Global Semiconductor Supply Chain in an Uncertain Era (April 2021)
- US Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce Implements New Export Controls on Advanced Computing and Semiconductor Manufacturing Items to the PRC (7 October 2022)
- International Energy Agency, Energy and AI: Energy demand from AI (2025)
- Stanford HAI, The 2025 AI Index Report, Chapter 1: Research and Development
- European Commission, AI Act: regulatory framework for artificial intelligence
- Data Center Dynamics, Saudi Arabian AI venture Humain buys 18,000 Nvidia GB300 chips, several hundred thousand more on the way (14 May 2025)

